>At 04:16 PM 1/30/01, Dap wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I'm currently writing an appliction to tokinize SAOL source code.
>>I have two questions about it:
>>
>>1
>>In the Bitstream token table of the 'Structured Audio' specification there
>>are
>>two values for the 'buzz' keyword (0x7C and 0xB5). Is this a documentation
>>error?
>>Which one should I use.
>
>My understanding is that one is the core opcode and the other one the
wavetable
>generator. In textual format they have the same "spelling", in binary
format they have
>not.
>
Thanks Giorgio,
So it is not possible to develop a program that generates the tokens for
some given
SAOL source without doing syntax/semantic analysis as well!?
In the SAOL source there is no difference between the two words, so why
making a
difference in the token codes based on the context? This makes things so
complicated.
Cor.
>
>>I guess there is still no errate on the specifications yet. But I suppose
>>someone (Eric?) keeps
>>track of all reported problems/errors. Is such a list available for
>>developpers?
>
>A corrigendum has been approved and edited at the last meeting in Pisa.
More news
>(the ones you ask for :-)) will be available as soon as the formal
procedure is finalized
>by MPEG, i.e. after the 9th of February.
>
>Best regards,
>
> Giorgio
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>Giorgio ZOIA
>
>Integrated Systems Laboratory - DE/LSI - EPFL
>CH-1015 Lausanne - SWITZERLAND
>
>Phone: + 41 21 693 69 79 E-mail: Giorgio.Zoia@epfl.ch
>Fax: +41 21 693 46 63
>__________________________________________________________________
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 12:11:06 EST