>1. Only defining the first X symbols in the symbol table, when there are
>more than X symbols used in the orc/sco.
Yes. Actually, it's not only the count of symbols used, but their indices.
For example, the symbol table could define names for 20 symbols, #0-#19,
but the orchestra only uses symbol #3, #28, and #674. #3 will have a
name, #28 and #674 will not.
>2. Making some strings in the symbol table zero length.
Argh. The standard is silent on this, which isn't right. I suggest that
your
intepretation is a good one; that a zero-length symbol table entry means
that there is simply no name for a symbol. I've added this to the
corrigendum list.
Best,
-- Eric
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 10 2000 - 12:15:47 EDT