This is starting to sound to me like an argument that we oughtn't
settle on a particular compressor at all within the core SAOL
functionality, since applications will differ so widely in the
functionality
they need.
If so, it's probably best just to dump the broken ones that are in
the spec (not implemented yet) now. Arguments?
-- Eric
----------
> From: Sampo A Syreeni <ssyreeni@cc.helsinki.fi>
> The Moorer system probably tries to achieve some specific
psycho-acoustical
> effect, probably increasing the perceived loudness of the signal without
> increasing the dynamics of the signal at the same time. The compressors
used
> in common sound editors tend to be less specialized and, alas, less well
> designed. But of course the usage of these compressors is quite
different:
> Cool Edit is primarily used for mutilating sound for 'cool' effects,
> research compressors are used for more specific needs, such as noise
removal
> or well planned psycho-acoustical enhancement...
>
> Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>, Decoy/Dawn, Student (Math, Helsinki
University)
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 11:46:31 EST