Re: Csound to SAOL conversion

From: Gustavo André Hoffmann (gusthoff@ieee.org)
Date: Mon Aug 13 2001 - 21:46:28 EDT


Hello!

> core opcodes that would suffice for most orchestras. This
> may be significantly smaller than the entire core opcode
> set (I'm not really a CSound person, but I was under the
> impression this was one of the goals of the Extended CSound
> project, please correct me if this isn't right).

        Actually, I'm just a "CSound student", not a CSound
expert. So I cannot answer this question, but I think you're right.
We should ask Barry Vercoe.

> MPEG has change control, it can add things to SAOL. Realistically,
> this means joining MPEG and pushing your vision through the
> organizational structure, or working with sympathic MPEG members.

        In other words: "unless you are someone important, no
one will listen to you." Who cares what I think?
        By the way, who is responsible for the Structured Audio
standard now?

        You gave me (and the list) a lot of ideas. Many, many
thanks! Your ideas will certainly help me in this work. I hope I can
make something usefull to share with you in the near future.

Best regards,

Gustavo André Hoffmann
mailto:gusthoff@ieee.org
ICQ# 48696602
http://gusthoff.iuma.com
http://www.geocities.com/gusthoff



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 11:46:43 EST