>It's possible to make instruments in SAOL that use none of the core
>opcodes at all -- in this sense, any new synthesis technique you come
>up with can be implemented in SAOL. From the book, you can see this
>done both by coding up instruments directly:
yeah, i can see that its realy down to basics, but im not a c coder, so i
dont get much out of those examples. Excuse my ignorance - im getting into
that coding stuff some day - promiss!!!
(whats core opcodes btw?)
>These instruments are both really boring (sine-wave oscillators) but
>it shows that all the tools are there to code algorithms at the lowest
>level ...
I see. So that means YES, i can do things never done before... IF i have the
coding skill (obviousely i would be able to do anything if i had the skill
but... you know)
>Sfront, at least, does a pretty good job at handling low-level code
>efficiently, since it just converts the SAOL code into C code, and
>schedules it at the appropriate rate -- you can look at the sa.c
>file created by sfront, and pretty much figure out where your
well, that sfront programs output needs to be compiled right? - i dont have
a compiler, so i guess i cant make the dlls huh? I really need that C stuff
dont i?
Am i too inexpirienced for this?
Lars
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 11:46:35 EST